Matthew Enders v. Ryder Integrated Logistics, Incorporated; the Parksite Group

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1852
MATTHEW ENDERS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RYDER INTEGRATED LOGISTICS, INCORPORATED; THE PARKSITE
GROUP,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge.
(1:08-cv-03211-JFM; 1:08-cv-03042-JFM)
Submitted: January 8, 2010 Decided: January 25, 2010
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Matthew Enders, Appellant Pro Se. Lindsey Hager McGinnis,
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C., McLean, Virginia; James R. Pranger,
NEAL, GERBER AND EISENBERG, LLC, Chicago, Illinois; Steven D.
Silverman, Andrew Clayton White, SILVERMAN, THOMPSON, SLUTKIN &
WHITE, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Matthew Enders appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment for Appellees. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Enders v. Ryder
Integrated Logistics, Inc., Nos. 1:08-cv-03211-JFM;
1:08-cv-03042-JFM (D. Md. July 16, 2009). We deny as moot
Enders’ motion to expedite and dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --