The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-1840•Thomas C. Burcher v. Siemans Automotive Corporation
09-1840Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 25, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1840
THOMAS C. BURCHER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SIEMANS AUTOMOTIVE CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Newport News. Jerome B. Friedman,
District Judge. (4:08-cv-00106-JBF)
Submitted: February 11, 2010 Decided: February 25, 2010
Before KING, GREGORY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher D. Supino, Adam H. Lotkin, NORRIS, ST. CLAIR &
LOTKIN, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for Appellant. Shepherd D.
Wainger, Erin Q. Ashcroft, MCGUIREWOODS, LLP, Norfolk, Virginia,
for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Thomas C. Burcher appeals the district court’s order
granting Appellee’s motion for summary judgment. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Burcher v. Siemans Automotive Corp., No. 4:08-cv-00106-JBF (E.D.
Va. June 29, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.