The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-1813•Adrienne S. Vance; Hollis Vance v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.p.
09-1813Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 4, 2011
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1813
ADRIENNE S. VANCE; HOLLIS VANCE,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P.,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
District of West Virginia, at Elkins. John Preston Bailey,
Chief District Judge. (2:07-cv-00101-JPB-JSK)
Submitted: January 19, 2011 Decided: February 4, 2011
Before AGEE, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Harry A. Smith, III, MCNEER HIGHLAND MCMUNN & VARNER L.C.,
Elkins, West Virginia, for Appellants. Renatha S. Garner,
MACCORKLE LAVENDER & SWEENEY PLLC, Charleston, West Virginia;
Heather M. Noel, MACCORKLE LAVENDER & SWEENEY PLLC, Morgantown,
West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Adrienne S. Vance and Hollis Vance appeal the district
court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in this
negligence action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Vance v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., No.
2:07-cv-00101-JPB-JSK (N.D. W. Va. June 17, 2009). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.