The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-1777•Radhia Haj-Mabrouk, individually and as Parent and Next Friend of L.H., a Minor v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.p.; Wal-Mart Stores, Incorporated
09-1777Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 13, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1777
RADHIA HAJ-MABROUK, individually and as Parent and Next
Friend of L.H., a Minor,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WAL-MART STORES EAST, L.P.; WAL-MART STORES, INCORPORATED,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge.
(1:08-cv-01740-JFM)
Submitted: August 2, 2010 Decided: September 13, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, KING, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gerard J. Emig, Matthew J. Focht, GLEASON, FLYNN, EMIG &
FOGLEMAN, CHARTERED, Rockville, Maryland, for Appellant. Warren
D. Stephens, DECARO, DORAN, SICILIANO, GALLAGHER & DEBLASIS,
LLP, Bowie, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Radhia Haj-Mabrouk, individually and as parent and
next friend of L.H., appeals the district court’s order granting
summary judgment in favor of Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., in her
civil action alleging that Wal-Mart employees’ negligence
resulted in her slip and fall, which caused injuries to her and
prenatal injuries to her son. Our review of the record and the
briefs filed by the parties discloses no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Haj-Mabrouk v. Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P., No. 1:08-cv-
01740-JFM (D. Md. June 30, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.