The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-1775•John David Hendrickson v. Janelle Dawn Walker
09-1775Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 14, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1775
JOHN DAVID HENDRICKSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JANELLE DAWN WALKER,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony John Trenga,
District Judge. (1:09-cv-00562-AJT-TRJ)
Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 14, 2009
Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John David Hendrickson, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John David Hendrickson appeals the district court’s
orders dismissing his complaint without prejudice pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i) and (ii) (2006) for being frivolous
and for failing to state a claim on which relief may be granted,
and denying reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Hendrickson v.
Walker, No. 1:09-cv-00562-AJT-TRJ (E.D. Va. June 10, 2009). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.