The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-1758•TODD M. JACK, M.S., Ph.D., Trustee v. WILLIAM STUBBLEFIELD, Ph.D., County Commissioner of Berkeley County
09-1758Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 9, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1758
TODD M. JACK, M.S., Ph.D., Trustee,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
WILLIAM STUBBLEFIELD, Ph.D., County Commissioner of Berkeley
County,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, District
Judge. (5:09-cv-00046-gec)
Submitted: August 28, 2009 Decided: September 9, 2009
Before MICHAEL and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Todd M. Jack, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Todd M. Jack appeals the district court’s order
dismissing this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
(ii) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Jack v. Stubblefield, No. 5:09-cv-00046-gec
(W.D. Va. filed June 22, entered June 23, 2009). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.