The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-1755•Veenu Mehta v. JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General of the United States Postal Service, a Federal Agency
09-1755Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 14, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1755
VEENU MEHTA,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General of the United States
Postal Service, a Federal Agency,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Anthony J. Trenga,
District Judge. (1:07-cv-01257-AJT-TRJ)
Submitted: June 4, 2010 Decided: July 14, 2010
Before NIEMEYER, MOTZ, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Veenu Mehta, Appellant Pro Se. Dana James Boente, Kevin J.
Mikolashek, Assistant United States Attorneys, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Veenu Mehta appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of Appellee in this
employment discrimination action. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Mehta v. Potter,
No. 1:07-cv-01257-AJT-TRJ (E.D. Va. filed June 4, 2009 & entered
June 5, 2009). We deny Mehta’s motion to file a formal brief.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.