The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-1717•Eugene Paul Harrison, a/k/a Eugene P. Harrison, a/k/a Eugene Paul Harrison, Sr. v. BINGO OLD SOLOMON KITCHEN; JAMES FELDER, Owner; ROCHELLE HEYWARD, Manager
09-1717Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 19, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1717
EUGENE PAUL HARRISON, a/k/a Eugene P. Harrison, a/k/a
Eugene Paul Harrison, Sr.,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
BINGO OLD SOLOMON KITCHEN; JAMES FELDER, Owner; ROCHELLE
HEYWARD, Manager,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
JESSE FOSTER,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District
Judge. (3:08-cv-02651-PMD)
Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 19, 2009
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eugene Paul Harrison, Appellant Pro Se. James Felder; Rochelle
Heyward, Appellees Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Eugene Paul Harrison appeals the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
granting summary judgment to the Defendants in his civil action.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Harrison v. Bingo Old Solomon Kitchen, No. 3:08-cv-
02651-PMD (D.S.C. June 19, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.