The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-1633•Tommy Lee Stevens v. TOM EFFLER, Detective
09-1633Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 5, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1633
TOMMY LEE STEVENS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TOM EFFLER, Detective,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard,
Senior District Judge. (5:08-cv-00618-H)
Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 5, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tommy Lee Stevens, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Tommy Lee Stevens appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing as frivolous his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the
record and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeal for the reasons stated by the district court.
Stevens v. Effler, No. 5:08-cv-00618-H (E.D.N.C. May 28, 2009).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.