The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-1630•Francisco Noreiga-Quijano v. JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service
09-1630Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 27, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1630
FRANCISCO NOREIGA-QUIJANO,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JOHN E. POTTER, Postmaster General, United States Postal
Service,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Louise W. Flanagan,
Chief District Judge. (5:07-cv-00204-FL)
Submitted: July 23, 2009 Decided: July 27, 2009
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Francisco Noreiga-Quijano, Appellant Pro Se. Edward D. Gray,
Lora M. Taylor-Tripp, Assistant United States Attorneys, Kelly
Michele Perry, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Francisco Noreiga-Quijano appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his complaint alleging employment
discrimination. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Noreiga-Quijano v. Potter, No. 5:07-cv-
00204-FL (E.D.N.C. Mar. 31, 2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.