The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-1598•Norman Abbott; Dinah Abbott v. Sun Trust Mortgage Incorporated
09-1598Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 14, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1598
NORMAN ABBOTT; DINAH ABBOTT,
Petitioners - Appellants,
v.
SUN TRUST MORTGAGE INCORPORATED,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:08-cv-00665-REP)
Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 14, 2009
Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Norman Abbott and Dinah Abbott, Appellants Pro Se. Curtis
Gilbert Manchester, Travis Aaron Sabalewski, REED SMITH, LLP,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Norman and Dinah Abbott appeal the district court’s
order sanctioning them $1,000 and enjoining them from filing any
action involving the subject matter of the instant action, and
enjoining them from further unrelated filings without payment of
the sanction and leave of court. We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to
proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for the reasons
stated by the district court. Abbott v. Sun Trust Mortgage
Inc., No. 3:08-cv-00665-REP (E.D. Va. Apr. 8, 2009). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.