Michael Moment v. State of Maryland

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1544
MICHAEL MOMENT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF MARYLAND; MARTIN O’MALLEY, Governor; DOUGLAS F.
GANSLER, Attorney General; MONTGOMERY COUNTY MARYLAND; IKE
LEGGEIL, County Executive for Montgomery County,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge.
(8:09-cv-01081-DKC)
Submitted: October 20, 2009 Decided: October 23, 2009
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge, and
HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Moment, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Moment appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his civil complaint for lack of jurisdiction pursuant
to the Rooker-Feldman doctrine.* We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Moment’s motion
for injunctive relief and affirm for the reasons stated by the
district court. Moment v. Maryland, No. 8:09-cv-01081-DKC (D.
Md. May 4, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
* Dist. of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S.
462 (1983); Rooker v. Fid. Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923).

-- 2 of 2 --