The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-1417•Brenda A. Rogers v. United States of America
09-1417Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 14, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1417
BRENDA A. ROGERS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Jerome B. Friedman, District
Judge. (2:08-cv-00400-JBF-FBS)
Submitted: September 10, 2009 Decided: September 14, 2009
Before KING, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brenda A. Rogers, Appellant Pro Se. Edward C. Tompsett, SOCIAL
SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Virginia
Lynn Van Valkenburg, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk,
Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Brenda A. Rogers appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing as untimely her complaint seeking judicial review of
the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security in
denying her applications for benefits. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. See Rogers v.
Commissioner of Soc. Sec., No. 2:08-cv-00400-JBF-FBS (E.D. Va.
March 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.