The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-1409•Odessa Ghee v. Goodwill Industries
09-1409Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitSep 1, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1409
ODESSA GHEE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
GOODWILL INDUSTRIES,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, District Judge.
(1:09-CV-00251-JFM)
Submitted: August 26, 2009 Decided: September 1, 2009
Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and GREGORY and SHEDD, Circuit
Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Odessa Ghee, Appellant Pro Se. Kelly Culp Hoelzer, Darrell
Robert VanDeusen, KOLLMAN & SAUCIER, PA, Timonium, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Odessa Ghee appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment to the Defendant in her civil action.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See Ghee v. Goodwill Indus., No. 1:09-cv-00251-JFM (D.
Md. Mar. 10, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.