The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-1334•Perry Brown v. State of Maryland; Deputy Patrick H. Handy
09-1334Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 22, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1334
PERRY BROWN,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF MARYLAND; DEPUTY PATRICK H. HANDY,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
JOHN DOE,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:07-cv-01956-PJM)
Submitted: January 8, 2010 Decided: January 22, 2010
Before MOTZ and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Perry Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Corlie McCormick, Jr., David
Reid Moore, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND,
Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
-- 1 of 3 --
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Perry Brown appeals the district court’s final order
of judgment entered after a jury returned a defense verdict in
Brown’s civil action. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. Brown v. Maryland,
No. 8:07-cv-01956-PJM (D. Md. Feb. 23, 2009). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.