The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-1222•Adrian Marion Smith v. Bridgestone Firestone Tire Company; Ford Motor Company; Donnie Howard
09-1222Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 27, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1222
ADRIAN MARION SMITH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
BRIDGESTONE FIRESTONE TIRE COMPANY; FORD MOTOR COMPANY;
DONNIE HOWARD,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Aiken. Margaret B. Seymour, District Judge.
(1:08-cv-03049-MBS)
Submitted: July 23, 2009 Decided: July 27, 2009
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Adrian Marion Smith, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Adrian Marion Smith appeals from the district court’s
order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and
dismissing without prejudice and for lack of jurisdiction his
civil action filed against Bridgestone Firestone Tire Company,
Ford Motor Company, and Donnie Howard. We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. Smith v. Bridgestone
Firestone Tire Co., No. 1:08-cv-03049-MBS (D.S.C. filed Feb. 18,
2009; entered Feb. 19, 2009). We deny Smith’s motion for
transcripts at government expense and dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.