George E. Burdick v. Pritchett & Birch, Pllc

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1216
GEORGE E. BURDICK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PRITCHETT & BIRCH, PLLC; LLOYD C. SMITH, JR.; REGINA PARKER;
SAMUEL GRIMES; CHRISTOPHER B. MCLENDON,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle,
District Judge. (4:08-cv-00053-BO)
Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 5, 2009
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
George E. Burdick, Appellant Pro Se. Ronald Graham Baker,
BAKER, JENKINS, JONES & DALY, PA, Ahoskie, North Carolina, Grady
L. Balentine, Jr., Special Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh,
North Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
George E. Burdick appeals the district court’s orders
granting Defendants’ motion to dismiss his civil complaint for
lack of subject matter jurisdiction and denying his subsequent
motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Burdick v. Pritchett &
Birch, PLLC, No. 4:08-cv-00053-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 17, 2008;
Jan. 22, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --