Tammy J. Shaw v. Lynchburg Department of Social Services

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1210
TAMMY J. SHAW; KGS, minor by her next friend; CAS, minor by
her next friend; CJS, minor by her next friend,
Plaintiffs - Appellants,
v.
LYNCHBURG DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES; BOB MCDONNELL,
State Attorney General; ELEANOR DUNN, Deputy City Attorney;
TIM KAINE; SALLY BARCA; LISA PARKS; DR. A. J. ANDERSON;
INVESTIGATOR ROBERT W. MOORE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, District
Judge. (6:08-cv-00022-nkm-mfu)
Submitted: September 15, 2009 Decided: September 22, 2009
Before GREGORY and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Tammy J. Shaw, Appellant Pro Se. Alexander W. Bell, BELL &
SCHNEIDER, PLC, Lynchburg, Virginia; Paul Kugelman, Jr., OFFICE
OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, Virginia; Nora
Beth Dorsey, Daniel M. Kincheloe, Jodi Beth Simopoulos, HANCOCK,
DANIEL, JOHNSON & NAGLE, PC, Glen Allen, Virginia, for
Appellees.

-- 1 of 3 --

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Tammy J. Shaw appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Shaw v. Lynchburg Dep’t of Soc. Servs., No.
6:08-cv-00022-nkm-mfu (W.D. Va. Jan. 29, 2009). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --