The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-1152•Mohammad Gondel; Saleem Iqbal Gondel v. Pmig 1020, LLC; E & Centerprises, Incorporated; Petroleum Marketing Group, Incorporated
09-1152Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitNov 9, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1152
MOHAMMAD GONDEL; SALEEM IQBAL GONDEL,
Plaintiffs – Appellants,
v.
PMIG 1020, LLC; E & C ENTERPRISES, INCORPORATED; PETROLEUM
MARKETING GROUP, INCORPORATED,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
(1:08-cv-01768-CCB)
Submitted: October 19, 2009 Decided: November 9, 2009
Before MICHAEL, KING, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Thomas F. DeCaro, Jr., DECARO AND HOWELL, PC, Upper Marlboro,
Maryland, for Appellants. Harry C. Storm, Stuart A. Schwager,
LERCH, EARLY & BREWER, CHTD., Bethesda, Maryland, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Mohammad Gondel and Saleem Iqbal Gondel appeal from
the district court’s order dismissing their complaint for
failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. We
have reviewed the record and the briefs filed by the parties and
we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Gondel v. PMIG 1020,
LLC, No. 1:08-cv-01768-CCB (D. Md. Jan. 22, 2009). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.