The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-1147•Josephine P. Mourning v. Target Corporation
09-1147Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 23, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1147
JOSEPHINE P. MOURNING,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
TARGET CORPORATION,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Peter J. Messitte, Senior District
Judge. (8:07-cv-03212-PJM)
Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 23, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished by per curiam opinion.
Josephine P. Mourning, Appellant Pro Se. Steven Jonathan Kelly,
MILES & STOCKBRIDGE, P.C., Towson, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
In this personal injury action, Josephine P. Mourning
appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for
Target Corporation and the denial of Mourning’s motion for
reconsideration of that order. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Mourning v. Target Corp.,
No. 8:07-cv-03212-PJM (D. Md. Dec. 2, 2008). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.