The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-1139•Michael Moment v. State of Maryland
09-1139Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 23, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1139
MICHAEL MOMENT,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
STATE OF MARYLAND; MARTIN O’MALLEY, Governor; DOUGLAS F.
GANSLER, Attorney General; IKE LEGGEIL, County Executive for
Montgomery County,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:09-
cv-00086-RWT)
Submitted: June 18, 2009 Decided: June 23, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael Moment, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Michael Moment appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his civil complaint and denying his motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Moment v. Maryland, No. 8:09-cv-00086-
RWT (D. Md. Jan. 22, 2009; Jan. 29, 2009). Moment’s motion for
injunctive relief pending appeal is denied. We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.