The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
09-1081•Joan E. Jackson v. PETER GEREN, The Honorable, Acting Secretary, Department of the Army
09-1081Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 13, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1081
JOAN E. JACKSON,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
PETER GEREN, The Honorable, Acting Secretary, Department of
the Army,
Defendant – Appellee,
v.
BRIANNA SKINNER-HARRIS,
Movant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Greenbelt. Alexander Williams, Jr., District
Judge. (8:07-cv-00851-AW)
Submitted: April 29, 2009 Decided: May 13, 2009
Before WILKINSON, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Joan E. Jackson, Appellant Pro Se. Alex Gordon, Assistant
United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Dr. Joan E. Jackson appeals the district court’s order
granting summary judgment in favor of the Honorable Peter Geren,
Acting Secretary, Department of the Army, on her claim for
retaliation pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of
1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e (2000). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Jackson v. Geren, No.
8:07-cv-00851-AW (D. Md. Nov. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.