The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-8614•Christopher A. Odom v. JON OZMINT, Director
08-8614Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 28, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8614
CHRISTOPHER A. ODOM,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
JON OZMINT, Director; MARY BROWN, Clerk; KERRIE SPECHT,
Parole Officer; RALPH HUNTER, DHO; MR. STEVEN, Case Worker;
MRS. LAVERETTE; MR. HALLMAN,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Insurance Policy
Holder,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Patrick Michael Duffy, District
Judge. (3:07-cv-00343-PMD)
Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 28, 2009
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher A. Odom, Appellant Pro Se. Erin Mary Farrell, John
Eric Kaufmann, Donald Ray Settana, Jr., MCKAY, CAUTHEN, SETTANA
& STUBLEY, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Christopher A. Odom appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Odom v.
Ozmint, No. 3:07-cv-00343-PMD (D.S.C. Oct. 30, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.