The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-8571•Willie Lee Berry v. M. Timothy Porterfield
08-8571Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 27, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8571
WILLIE LEE BERRY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
M. TIMOTHY PORTERFIELD,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen,
Senior District Judge. (3:01-cv-00627-GCM)
Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 27, 2009
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Willie Lee Berry, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Willie Lee Berry appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reconsideration of its previous order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) action. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. Berry v.
Porterfield, No. 3:01-cv-00627-GCM (W.D.N.C. Dec. 4, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.