The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-8511•United States of America v. Emmanuel Uzuegbunam
08-8511Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 24, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8511
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
EMMANUEL UZUEGBUNAM,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:96-cr-00043-REP-1)
Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 24, 2009
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Robert James Wagner, Assistant Federal Public Defender,
Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Richard Daniel Cooke,
Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Emmanuel Uzuegbunam appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Uzuegbunam's motion
for appointment of counsel and affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. United States v. Uzuegbunam, No. 3:96-cr-
00043-REP-1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 7, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.