The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-8480•United States of America v. Dave Andrae Taylor, a/k/a Indian, a/k/a Nicholas, a/k/a Spike
08-8480Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 24, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8480
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAVE ANDRAE TAYLOR, a/k/a Indian, a/k/a Nicholas, a/k/a
Spike,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior
District Judge. (3:99-cr-00145-REP-2)
Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 24, 2009
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dave Andrae Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. G. Wingate Grant, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Michael Arlen Jagels, Special
Assistant United States Attorney, Robert E. Trono, Assistant
United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Dave Andrae Taylor appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence filed
under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Taylor’s
motion for appointment of counsel and affirm. United States v.
Taylor, No. 3:99-cr-00145-REP-2 (E.D. Va. Nov. 7, 2008). We
deny Taylor’s motion to schedule oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.