Eddie Moore v. Rudolph Tillman, in his individual capacity

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8453
EDDIE MOORE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
RUDOLPH TILLMAN, in his individual capacity; JANICE
MONTGOMERY, in her individual capacity; WILLIAM WHITE, in
his individual capacity; DONALD DRISKILL, in his individual
capacity; DENISE HINSON, in her individual capacity; GLENN
S. SHERMAN, in his individual capacity; CHARLES YATES, in
his individual capacity; GLENDA ROBINSON, in her individual
capacity; MARSHALL CLEMENT SANFORD, JR., in his individual
capacity; ROBERT M. STEVENSON, in his individual and
official capacity; JON OZMINT, in his individual and
official capacity,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(3:07-cv-03209-RBH)
Submitted: July 23, 2009 Decided: July 27, 2009
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Eddie Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Frank Barnwell McMaster, John
Gregg McMaster, Jr., TOMPKINS & MCMASTER, Columbia, South

-- 1 of 3 --

Carolina; David Michael Tatarsky, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2

-- 2 of 3 --

3
PER CURIAM:
Eddie Moore appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Moore
v. Tillman, No. 3:07-cv-03209-RBH (D.S.C. Aug. 18, 2008;
Sept. 25, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 3 of 3 --