The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-8421•United States of America v. Andres Morales
08-8421Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 4, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8421
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ANDRES MORALES,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:05-cr-00322-RDB-4)
Submitted: April 23, 2009 Decided: May 4, 2009
Before MICHAEL, GREGORY, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Andres Morales, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Manuelian,
Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Andres Morales appeals the district court’s orders
denying relief on his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2006), and on his motion for reconsideration. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. United States v. Morales, No. 1:05-cr-00322-RDB-4 (D.
Md. Oct. 7, 2008; Oct. 27, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.