The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-8420•Julian Edward Rochester v. Seneca Town and Insurance Company; 1000
08-8420Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 26, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8420
JULIAN EDWARD ROCHESTER,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SENECA TOWN AND INSURANCE COMPANY; 1000 DEFENDANTS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Charleston. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., Senior
District Judge. (2:08-cv-03417-HMH-RSC)
Submitted: January 28, 2010 Decided: February 26, 2010
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Julian Edward Rochester, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Julian Edward Rochester appeals the district court’s
order dismissing this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)
(ii) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we deny the motion for declaratory judgment
and affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.
Rochester v. Seneca Town & Ins. Co., No. 2:08-cv-03417-HMH-RSC
(D.S.C. Oct. 8, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.