The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-8409•Brandon Williams v. OFFICER VINSON; D.S. STORY, Supervisor; SERGEANT DOLE
08-8409Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 17, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8409
BRANDON WILLIAMS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
OFFICER VINSON; D.S. STORY, Supervisor; SERGEANT DOLE,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:08-cv-00851-LMB-TCB)
Submitted: March 12, 2009 Decided: March 17, 2009
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brandon Williams, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Brandon Williams appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint for failure to
state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. Williams v. Officer Vinson, No.
1:08-cv-00851-LMB-TCB (E.D. Va. filed Oct. 22, 2008 & entered
Oct. 27, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.