The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-8377•Annis Recardo Lloyd v. Connie Jordan; Judge J. Hockenbury; Judge Lanier; Roddey Brown
08-8377Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 27, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8377
ANNIS RECARDO LLOYD,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
CONNIE JORDAN; JUDGE J. HOCKENBURY; JUDGE LANIER; RODDEY
BROWN,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Dever, III,
District Judge. (5:08-ct-03119-D)
Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 27, 2009
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Annis Recardo Lloyd, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Annis Recardo Lloyd appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find
that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Lloyd v.
Jordan, No. 5:08-ct-03119-D (E.D.N.C. Oct. 30, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.