The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-8362•United States of America v. CLAUDIO OTERO, JR., a/k/a Bill
08-8362Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 15, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8362
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CLAUDIO OTERO, JR., a/k/a Bill,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 09-7417
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CLAUDIO OTERO, JR., a/k/a Bill,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Lynchburg. Norman K. Moon, District
Judge. (6:99-cr-70054-nkm-mfu-6)
Submitted: May 27, 2010 Decided: June 15, 2010
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KING, Circuit Judges.
-- 1 of 3 --
2
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Claudio Otero, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Anthony Paul Giorno,
Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Claudio Otero, Jr., appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2006) and his motion for reconsideration. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United
States v. Otero
AFFIRMED
, No. 6:99-cr-70054-nkm-6 (W.D. Va. Sept. 15,
2008 & July 15, 2009). We deny Otero’s motion for appointment
of counsel and dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.