The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-8341•Ronald Gary v. Ms. Brewington, Rn
08-8341Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJul 21, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8341
RONALD GARY,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MS. BREWINGTON, RN; DOCTOR SHERMAN, MD; MR. DOIGHERTY,
Director of Greenville County Detention Center; COUNTY OF
GREENVILLE,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
GREENVILLE COUNTY DETENTION CENTER,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. Patrick Michael Duffy, District
Judge. (4:06-cv-02216-PMD-TER)
Submitted: July 13, 2009 Decided: July 21, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Ronald Gary, Appellant Pro Se. Russell W. Harter, Jr., CHAPMAN,
HARTER & GROVES, P.A., Greenville, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
-- 1 of 3 --
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Ronald Gary appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gary v.
Brewington, No. 4:06-cv-02216-PMD-TER (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2008).
We deny Gary’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.