The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-8339•United States of America v. John William Clements, a/k/a Bam, a/k/a Greg Dion, a/k/a John Harmon
08-8339Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 23, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8339
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff – Appellee,
v.
JOHN WILLIAM CLEMENTS, a/k/a Bam, a/k/a Greg Dion, a/k/a
John Harmon,
Defendant – Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Charleston. Joseph R. Goodwin,
Chief District Judge. (2:99-cr-00198-4)
Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 23, 2009
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John William Clements, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John William Clements appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Clements, No. 2:99-cr-00198-4 (S.D.W. Va. Oct. 20, 2008); see
also United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247, 252-56 (4th Cir.
2009), petition for cert. filed, Mar. 20, 2009 (No. 08-1185).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.