The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-8334•United States of America v. Ernest Edward Johnson, a/k/a Ernest Edward Cromwell
08-8334Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJan 26, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8334
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ERNEST EDWARD JOHNSON, a/k/a Ernest Edward Cromwell,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Catherine C. Blake, District Judge.
(1:99-cr-00034-CCB-1)
Submitted: January 15, 2009 Decided: January 26, 2009
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Sherri Lee Keene, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER,
Greenbelt, Maryland; Nicholas J. Vitek, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL
PUBLIC DEFENDER, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellant. Andrea L.
Smith, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Ernest Edward Johnson appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for reduction of sentence, 18 U.S.C.
3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Johnson, No. 1:99-cr-
00034-CCB-1 (D. Md. Oct. 15, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.