Annette Ross v. MR. YOUNG, Therapist

08-8333Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 2, 2009

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8333
ANNETTE ROSS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
MR. YOUNG, Therapist; MR. BARLOWE, Therapist; DR. PAYLO,
Mental Health Director; S. JOHNSON, Correctional Officer;
MR. HAUSKINS, Sgt. of F.C.C.W.; MS. HULL, Unit
Director/Security of Bldg #2; MS. WALKER, Asst. Warden of
F.C.C.W.; SGT. GONZALES, Sargent of F.C.C.W.; DR. DAVID,
Psychiatrist for F.C.C.W.; DR. MCDONALD, Doctor of F.C.C.W.;
DR. RAMOLI, Doctor of F.C.C.W.; CAPTAIN JONES, Captain, MS.
M. JONES, Hearing Officer,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, Senior
District Judge. (7:08-cv-00522-jct-mfu)
Submitted: September 29, 2009 Decided: October 2, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Annette Ross, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Annette Ross appeals the district court’s order
denying relief on her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We
have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. Ross v. Young, No. 7:08-cv-00522-jct-mfu (W.D. Va.
Oct. 16, 2008. We deny Ross’s motion to reconsider the denial
of her motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.