The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-8316•Adelson Michel v. RAYMOND A. COSTABILE, Medical Doctor at Virginia Ambulatory Surgery Center
08-8316Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 17, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8316
ADELSON MICHEL,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
RAYMOND A. COSTABILE, Medical Doctor at Virginia Ambulatory
Surgery Center; KATHLEEN HWANG, Medical Doctor at Virginia
Ambulatory Surgery Center,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Glen E. Conrad, District
Judge. (7:08-cv-00533-gec-mfu)
Submitted: March 12, 2009 Decided: March 17, 2009
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Adelson Michel, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Adelson Michel appeals the district court’s order
dismissing under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006) his complaint filed
pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of
Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Michel v. Costabile,
No. 7:08-cv-00533-gec-mfu (W.D. Va. Oct. 8, 2008). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.