The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-8293•United States of America v. Roy Edward Taylor, a/k/a Big Roy, a/k/a Roy Penn
08-8293Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitOct 2, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8293
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
ROY EDWARD TAYLOR, a/k/a Big Roy, a/k/a Roy Penn,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of Virginia, at Charlottesville. Norman K. Moon,
District Judge. (3:99-cr-00076-nkm-1)
Submitted: August 17, 2009 Decided: October 2, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Roy Edward Taylor, Appellant Pro Se. Jean Barrett Hudson,
Assistant United States Attorney, Bruce A. Pagel, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Charlottesville, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Roy Edward Taylor appeals the district court’s order
granting his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006), and its subsequent order denying his
motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Taylor,
No. 3:99-cr-00076-nkm-1 (W.D. Va. Sept. 23, 2008; Oct. 17,
2008). See United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir.),
cert. denied, 129 S. Ct. 2401 (2009). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.