The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-8259•United States of America v. Jamal Timothy Hawkins
08-8259Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 9, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8259
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JAMAL TIMOTHY HAWKINS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Leonie M. Brinkema,
District Judge. (1:05-cr-00497-LMB-1)
Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 9, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Frances H. Pratt, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Alexandria,
Virginia, for Appellant. Jonathan Leo Fahey, Assistant United
States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Jamal Timothy Hawkins appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence
under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the
record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for
the reasons stated by the district court. United States v.
Hawkins, No. 1:05-cr-00497-LMB-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 7, 2008); see
United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir. 2009). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.