The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-8176•United States of America v. Mujaddid Rahim Muhammad, f/k/a Stacey Lamar Marsh
08-8176Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 3, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8176
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
MUJADDID RAHIM MUHAMMAD, f/k/a Stacey Lamar Marsh,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern
District of West Virginia, at Huntington. Robert C. Chambers,
District Judge. (3:91-cr-00114-2)
Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 3, 2009
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Mujaddid Rahim Muhammad, Appellant Pro Se. John J. Frail,
Assistant United States Attorney, Charleston, West Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Mujaddid Rahim Muhammad appeals the district court’s
order granting his motion to reduce his sentence filed pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), and the order denying
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Muhammad, No. 3:91-cr-
00114-2 (S.D.W. Va. Mar. 28, 2008; Sept. 24, 2008); see United
States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir. 2009), petition for
cert. filed, 77 U.S.L.W. 3559 (U.S. Mar. 20, 2009) (No.
08-1185). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.