The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-8167•Gary Slezak v. SAMUEL B. GLOVER, Director of South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole
08-8167Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 3, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8167
GARY SLEZAK,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
SAMUEL B. GLOVER, Director of South Carolina Department of
Probation, Parole and Pardon Services in his individual and
official capacity; SOUTH CAROLINA PROBATION, PARDON AND
PAROLE BOARD, John and Jane Does in their official and
individual capacities; JON OZMINT, Director of the South
Carolina Department of Corrections in his individual and
official capacity; STANLEY BURT, Warden of Lieber
Correctional Institution in his individual and official
capacity; RAMNARINE JAGLAL, Dentist, in his individual and
official capacity,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Florence. R. Bryan Harwell, District Judge.
(4:06-cv-01122-RBH)
Submitted: May 28, 2009 Decided: June 3, 2009
Before WILKINSON, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Certiorari dismissed, January 11, 2010
-- 1 of 3 --
Gary Slezak, Appellant Pro Se. Kenneth Paul Woodington,
DAVIDSON & LINDEMANN, PA, Columbia, South Carolina, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2
-- 2 of 3 --
3
PER CURIAM:
Gary Slezak appeals the district court’s order denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Slezak
v. Glover, No. 4:06-cv-01122-RBH (D.S.C. Sept. 15, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 3 of 3 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.