United States of America v. Clarence Spratley

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8117
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
CLARENCE SPRATLEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior
District Judge. (3:95-cr-00008-RLW-1)
Submitted: January 30, 2009 Decided: February 13, 2009
Before NIEMEYER and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clarence Spratley, Appellant Pro Se. David Novak, OFFICE OF THE
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Elizabeth Wu, Assistant United States
Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Clarence Spratley appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582 (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Spratley, No. 3:95-cr-
00008-RLW-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 25, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --