The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-8073•United States of America v. Richard Rayordo Harris
08-8073Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitApr 23, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8073
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
RICHARD RAYORDO HARRIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore. Richard D. Bennett, District Judge.
(1:04-cr-00387-RDB-1)
Submitted: April 16, 2009 Decided: April 23, 2009
Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Richard Rayordo Harris, Appellant Pro Se. John Francis Purcell,
Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Richard Rayordo Harris appeals the district court’s
orders denying his motion for reconsideration of the order
granting his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v.
Harris, No. 1:04-cr-00387-RDB-1 (D. Md. filed Sept. 15, 2008 &
entered Sept. 16, 2008); see United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d
247 (4th Cir. 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.