The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-8066•United States of America v. John Fogg
08-8066Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 8, 2010
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8066
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JOHN FOGG,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief
District Judge. (3:05-cr-00030-JRS-1)
Submitted: February 25, 2010 Decided: March 8, 2010
Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
John Fogg, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Ronald Gill, Assistant
United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
John Fogg appeals the district court’s orders denying
his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c)(2) (2006) and subsequent motion for reconsideration.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See United States v. Fogg, No. 3:05-cr-00030-JRS-1 (E.D.
Va. June 10, 2008 & July 14, 2008). We deny Fogg’s motion for
appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.