The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-8062•Gary L. Wise v. SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; JON OZMINT, Director
08-8062Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitFeb 25, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8062
GARY L. WISE,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; JON OZMINT,
Director,
Defendants – Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry F. Floyd, District Judge.
(6:08-cv-00181-HFF)
Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 25, 2009
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gary L. Wise, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Gary L. Wise appeals the district court’s order
adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation to dismiss his
42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) claim as barred by the statute of
limitations. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible
error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.
See Wise v. South Carolina Dep’t of Corr., No. 6:08-cv-00181-HFF
(D.S.C. Aug. 18, 2008). We deny Wise’s motions for appointment
of counsel, for stay pending appeal and review of application of
appealability, and for a certificate of appealability. We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.