The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-8061•Curtis Glenn Hough v. Robert H. Hale, Jr.
08-8061Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitDec 29, 2008
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8061
CURTIS GLENN HOUGH,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
ROBERT H. HALE, JR.,
Defendant - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
Judge. (2:08-cv-00389-RBS-FBS)
Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 29, 2008
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Curtis Glenn Hough, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Curtis Glenn Hough appeals the district court’s order
dismissing his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(e)(2)(B) (2000). We have reviewed the record and find
that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly, we dismiss the
appeal for the reasons stated by the district court. Hough v.
Hale, No. 2:08-cv-00389-RBS-FBS (E.D. Va. filed Sept. 9 &
entered Sept. 10, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
DISMISSED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.