United States of America v. Dennis Harris

08-8051Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 6, 2009

Full text

UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8051
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DENNIS HARRIS,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr.,
Senior District Judge. (2:92-cr-00113-1)
Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 6, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dennis Harris, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart,
Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for
Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

-- 1 of 2 --

2
PER CURIAM:
Dennis Harris appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed pursuant to
18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006), and reconsideration of that
order. We have reviewed the record and find the district court
did not abuse its discretion in denying the motions. See United
States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (motion
under § 3582(c) “is subject to the discretion of the district
court”); United States v. Legree, 205 F.3d 724, 727 (4th Cir.
2000). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s orders for
the reasons stated therein. See United States v. Harris, No.
2:92-cr-00113-1 (E.D. Va. filed July 7, 2008, entered July 10,
2008; filed Aug. 27, 2008, entered Aug. 28, 2008). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

-- 2 of 2 --

Continue your research in ChatGPT or Claude

Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.