The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-8023•Christopher Eugene McCoy v. Sergeant White; Deputy Taylor
08-8023Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMay 11, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8023
CHRISTOPHER EUGENE MCCOY,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
SERGEANT WHITE; DEPUTY TAYLOR,
Defendants – Appellees,
and
ABDUL-HAMID JAMULDEEN, M.D.,
Defendant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca Beach Smith, District
Judge. (2:07-cv-00395-RBS-TEM)
Submitted: May 1, 2009 Decided: May 11, 2009
Before MICHAEL and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior
Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Christopher Eugene McCoy, Appellant Pro Se. Lisa Ehrich, Jeff
W. Rosen, PENDER & COWARD, PC, Virginia Beach, Virginia, for
Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Christopher Eugene McCoy appeals the district court’s
order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint.
We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district
court. See McCoy v. White, No. 2:07-cv-00395-RBS-TEM (E.D. Va.
Aug. 14, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.