The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-7953•Clarence J. Perry, Jr. v. J. P. FULTON, Judge: Norfolk Circuit Court
08-7953Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitMar 6, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7953
CLARENCE J. PERRY, JR.,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
v.
J. P. FULTON, Judge: Norfolk Circuit Court; S. CATHERINE
DODSON, Commonwealth Attorney Norfolk Circuit Court; WALTER
B. DALTON, Court-Appointed Attorney Norfolk Circuit Court,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Mark S. Davis, District
Judge. (2:08-cv-00368-MSD-TEM)
Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 6, 2009
Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Clarence J. Perry, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Clarence J. Perry, Jr., appeals the district court’s
order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985, 1986 (2000) complaint
under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record
and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. See Perry v. Fulton,
No. 2:08-cv-00368-MSD-TEM (E.D. Va. Aug. 14, 2008). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.