The AI workspace for legal professionals
- Legal research with access to more than 1 million sources
- Document automation
- Matter management
- Hosted in the EU and Switzerland
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
The AI workspace for legal professionals
Try it free for 14 days (10 questions/day during trial)
08-7908•United States of America v. Kenneth O. Langley
08-7908Court of Appeals for the Fourth CircuitJun 26, 2009
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7908
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
KENNETH O. LANGLEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan,
Chief District Judge. (4:04-cr-00073-FL-1)
Submitted: June 22, 2009 Decided: June 26, 2009
Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Keith Alan Williams, KEITH A. WILLIAMS, PA, Greenville, North
Carolina, for Appellant. Anne Margaret Hayes, Assistant United
States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Rehearing granted, July 26, 2010
-- 1 of 2 --
2
PER CURIAM:
Kenneth O. Langley appeals the district court’s order
granting Langley’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a
sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Langley, No. 4:04-cr-
00073-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. Sept. 8, 2008). We deny Langley’s motion
to expedite. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
-- 2 of 2 --
Connect Omnilex to search the legal corpus from your AI assistant.